- mood board
- mind map
- visualisation diagram
planning documents that couldn't be acceptable for feedbacking a meeting,
- sitemap
- blue sky thinking
- production schedule
Garmz has asked for a meeting to discuss the development of ideas for the website so far.
Identify ONE planning tool that Alexia could use to communicate her initial design ideas and evaluate the effectiveness of this compared to one other planning tool.
Plan for question .5
1. Mind map
- can always be added to
- it contains majority of words however can contain images and different font styles this showing how its versatile
- its simple and doesn't need large amount of explanation this making it a suitable tool for the client as they wont have much media background
- however a mind map doesn't show the visual ideas e.g colours, fonts and images therefore a mood board would be needed to visualise the words on the mind map.
e.g
- the map can contain images of draft fonts along with annotations this showing its versatility
- the mind map can contain sub headings for different pages of the website this once again making it easier and simpler for the client to understand.
2. Site map
- it will not contain ideas it will contain production instructions for the coder and graphic designer
- it will appear complicated for the client and they may get confused and unsure about ideas
- it doesn't show any visuals and just contains annotations this making it less visual for the clients.
e.g
- the map wont show any colours or fonts that will be used so they cant give feedback on the designs.
- the client will be confused on the annotations meant for the coder placed on the sitemap.#
A mind map would be suitable tool to convey ideas to the clients that Alexia is meeting with, its effective due to it is never completely finished this meaning that alexia can add additional ideas on at any time, this being effective as she can ensure that plans of certain pages contain all information needed.
Another effective quality of a mind map being that even though the majority of the plan will contain words it can have a picture or an image of a font draft this allows it to be versatile and have an element of visual to it, this will be effective as Alexia can back up her annotations with a picture this allowing it to show an element of visual to the clients.
A 3rd effective aspect of the mind map being that the mind map layout and design is very simple and easy to understand this is important as the clients probably don't have much media background and therefore if Alexia brought complicated planning documents they could get confused, for example Alexia could create sub headings on the mind map to show the different pages that she will be creating this once again making the document easier to understand.
However even though the document has positive aspects it does need to be backed up by a mood board to fully demonstrate the visual ideas that are being written about on the mind map, this other planning document makes such that the mind map is at its most effective.
A sitemap however wouldn't be sued to feedback ideas to the clients due to its unsuitable purpose,
due to the document containing notes for both the coder and graphic designer this could confuse the clients as they will have to differentiate different connotations aimed for two separate job roles.
Another negative aspect of the document being the complicated layout that it has if the reader doesn't have media knowledge this once again could confuse the clients this being an ineffective scenario caused by the document, along with this it doesn't have any visuals unlike the mood board and mind map combo this leaves the clients having to personally visualise colours and font themes for the website which could leave the clients with separate ideas due to them individually visualising the ideas.
Overall the mind map is the most suitable document to demonstrate ideas and therefore should be used in the meeting over the sitemap.